Deprecated: Function eregi() is deprecated in /home/wjolly/pokeraffiliateprograms/administrator/components/com_sh404sef/sh404sef.class.php on line 3039

Deprecated: Function eregi() is deprecated in /home/wjolly/pokeraffiliateprograms/administrator/components/com_sh404sef/sh404sef.class.php on line 3040

Deprecated: Function eregi() is deprecated in /home/wjolly/pokeraffiliateprograms/administrator/components/com_sh404sef/sh404sef.class.php on line 3039

Deprecated: Function eregi() is deprecated in /home/wjolly/pokeraffiliateprograms/administrator/components/com_sh404sef/sh404sef.class.php on line 3040

Warning: strtotime() [function.strtotime]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'America/Chicago' for 'CDT/-5.0/DST' instead in /home/wjolly/pokeraffiliateprograms/components/com_content/views/article/tmpl/default.php on line 76

Warning: date() [function.date]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'America/Chicago' for 'CDT/-5.0/DST' instead in /home/wjolly/pokeraffiliateprograms/components/com_content/views/article/tmpl/default.php on line 77

April 7th, 2009

More Coverage for Skill Vs. Chance Poker Debate

April 7, 2009 (PAP Newswire) -- As the nationwide movement to fully legalize poker in all its shapes and forms builds momentum in the U.S., more top-tier media outlets seem to be interested in carrying the story. Writing for ABCNews.com, Celeste Biever offers the latest take on the situation.

As we all know, many U.S. states have criminalized poker (land-based, online, or both), based on the assumption that it’s gambling, a historically touchy subject matter for American lawmakers. So, as Biever reminds us, the goal of the movement to exempt poker from these archaic laws is to prove that it’s not gambling, but a game of skill.

“Now two studies that tapped the vast amounts of data available from online casinos have provided some of the best evidence yet that poker is skill-based,” Biever writes. “Many hope that the results will help to roll back laws and court decisions that consider poker gambling, and therefore illegal in certain contexts.

“Previous attempts to quantify the relationship between skill and chance have involved building theoretical models or playing software bots against each other. However, Ingo Fiedler and Jan-Philipp Rock at the University of Hamburg's Institute of Law and Economics in Germany argue that these methods fail to reflect real games, and this may explain why some courts and lawmakers have yet to be swayed by them.”

Over a span of three months, according to the article, this pair of researchers in Germany tracked the results of 55,000 online poker players "playing millions of hands of poker's most popular variant, ‘no-limit Texas hold 'em’."

To give meaning to this research, they laid down two factors by which to judge whether the results would show that poker was a game of skill or chance. First, they measured the fluctuation of each player's wins and losses: “the higher this variance, the greater the role of chance”. Then, they measured “the average value of a player's winnings or losses: highly skilled or terrible players would do noticeably better or worse than would be expected by chance alone.”

When looking at the data with these two factors in mind, the researchers concluded that skill starts to dominate over chance after about 1,000 hands played. That amount, they state, is about the same as 33 hours of playing in person or 13 hours online, where play tends to be faster.

The article goes on to examine another case, with a much smaller field of study and a much simpler hypothesis: The Cigital study sponsored by PokerStars, which analyzed how many games ended with a “showdown”. Read about that study here.

The problem with these studies -- and with all such studies -- is that, no matter how much data one accumulates, it’s difficult to state authoritatively that your conclusions prove that the game is one of skill or chance. So, when these studies conclude that poker is “more a game of skill”, that's certainly helpful to the cause, but it doesn't exactly equal the kind of proof needed to sway grandstanding lawmakers.

So, the next best thing to incontrovertible evidence would be a body of research that leans heavily on one side of the skill vs. chance equation. And that is what is being built here: A groundswell of smaller cases that all point in the same direction. These studies, combined with recent pro-poker rulings in individual U.S. states like Pennsylvania, Colorado, and South Carolina, can have a cumulative effect that may be the deciding factor in whether a judge rules poker to be game of skill or chance -- even if actual scientific proof is never documented.  

To that end, "John Pappas of the Poker Players Alliance (PPA) in Washington DC says both studies are badly needed to help properly define the law,” writes Biever. “In many US states, judges and juries use a so-called ‘predominance test’ to gauge skill and chance, based on the opinions of expert witnesses.”

"The PPA expects the Cigital study will now be used as evidence to fight appeals against court rulings that decided poker is a skill game.”

Ultimately, though, the story’s biggest hint that the public may be starting to consider poker a game of skill is that the story was filed under ABCNews' “Technology & Science” section. Click here to read it.  


POSTED IN: Industry News
0 Comments
Leave a Comment

Please Login or Sign Up to leave a comment.

Most Viewed News

 

 
x  Cancel Login

I forgot my password
Not A Member? Sign up for Free Now!