Warning: strtotime() [function.strtotime]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'America/Chicago' for 'CST/-6.0/no DST' instead in /home/wjolly/pokeraffiliateprograms/components/com_content/views/article/tmpl/default.php on line 76

Warning: date() [function.date]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'America/Chicago' for 'CST/-6.0/no DST' instead in /home/wjolly/pokeraffiliateprograms/components/com_content/views/article/tmpl/default.php on line 77

October 28th, 2009

New Online Poker Regulations in U.S. May Be Game-Changers

October 28, 2009 (PAP Newswire) -- Since it seems that the UIGEA is here to stay, at least for the short term, some states have begun plans for legalizing and regulating Internet poker within their own borders, ignoring the larger national market.

One of the more confusing (and poorly understood) aspects of the UIGEA is that it doesn’t necessarily outlaw online gambling; it prevents inter-state online gambling. States are still theoretically free to set up their own online gaming networks within their own borders (with a certain amount of restrictions). California gave it a halting start last year and plans to try again in 2010. Florida is also considering doing so. 

There are many far-reaching results that would come from a trend of states legalizing online poker only within their own borders. For starters, it would likely prevent a nationwide online gambling law, hampering the efforts of Barney Frank and other legislators targeting the UIGEA.

Perhaps more significantly for the online poker industry, though, it would exclude foreign operators from doing business in the U.S.

That means that big brands like Full Tilt Poker and Everest Poker would be legally locked out of one of the largest and most lucrative Internet gambling markets in the world. And the results from that would be the rise of other, smaller online gambling companies — possibly just a single operator per state, or maybe even a state-run agency.

Then again, those brands are extremely popular, and Internet ooker players in the U.S. who have found ways to continue playing on them — and there are many; 1.5 million in California alone, according to most estimates — would probably prefer to continue doing so, basically shutting off the new sites. And that could lead to bigger problems, and possibly more messy legal fights in the U.S. — the last thing the online casino industry needs.

And if new companies did appear in each state, to what extent would these new companies offer affiliate marketing programs? And how reliable and/or profitable would they be for affiliates? Would it even work to offer an affiliate program that's only valid for one specific state? At this point, all this is anyone’s guess.

EGR Magazine has another take on the subject. Check it out here.
POSTED IN: Industry News
0 Comments
Leave a Comment

Please Login or Sign Up to leave a comment.

Most Viewed News

 

 
x  Cancel Login

I forgot my password
Not A Member? Sign up for Free Now!