Quote:
Originally Posted by mypokercorner
Excellent!
Also, for clarifications, $500 is used as an example. We'll have to agree on an amount and probably decide what's a fair contribution. For instance, if I pay $500 and promote on two websites, someone else who promotes the same thing on 10 different sites should probably pay more. Maybe the contribution amount should be a fixed per site? Just a tought. Or maybe no one cares. lol!
|
I think of 2 models:
1. If everyone is independent and just shares a league, i think a fix contribution per player would be the most adequate ($xy). Doesn´t matter if you bring 10 players from 10 sites or 100 from one.
This way the pot would grow accordingly to the number of the players. The more players, the bigger the pot; the bigger the pot, the bigger appeal to the players
Also, some fee should be reserved for the league management, further development or special prizes, promotions of the league?
2. If this project itself provides something new, becomes authentic and independent, and also makes profit itself, supposed it is a product of joint work, i think sharing at equal parts would be the best.
3. (2+1, lol) how about this - each affiliate has his own team and the winning team gets the bigger part of the cake?