| General Poker Affiliate Discussion The Largest Poker Affiliate Forum in The World. Poker Affiliates, Discuss Poker Affiliate Programs and issues facing the Poker Affiliate Industry Here! |

06-04-2005, 03:50 PM
|
|
|
Interesting...........
Quote:
Rothken Law Firm: California Court Gives Green Light to Lawsuit Against Yahoo!, Google, FindWhat and Other Search Engines for Alleged Illegal Involvement in Internet Gambling Advertising; Plaintiffs' Case to Move Forward
Business Wire - Friday June 3, 2005
SAN FRANCISCO, Jun 03, 2005 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- Defendants, including Yahoo!, Google, FindWhat and other major search engine websites lost their motion to strike core allegations in plaintiffs' complaint in the case of Cisneros et al v. Yahoo! et al (San Francisco County Superior Court). These allegations ask the Court to provide a remedy against the search engine's alleged illegal advertisement of Internet gambling. The Court made a ruling that allows the case to move forward.
Plaintiffs' complaint, filed last August in California Superior Court in San Francisco, alleges that Yahoo!, Google, Overture, Ask Jeeves, LookSmart, AltaVista, Terra Lycos, Jupiter, FindWhat, Kanoodle, Business.com, and Sex.Com all aided and abetted illegal gambling websites and violated California law by providing paid advertisements in violation of California Penal Code provisions and the Unlawful Business Practices Act. Californians, including minors, the elderly, and the poor, according to the complaint have lost millions of dollars to unscrupulous Internet gambling websites.
"The search engines, such as Yahoo! and Google, attempted to convince the court that they could advertise Internet gambling with immunity -- the court rejected that notion and allowed the case to proceed," said Reed Kathrein, an attorney for the plaintiffs.
"We are pleased that the Court denied the search engine defendants' motions to dismiss and strike allegations and we are optimistic that the Court will find that the defendants were involved in an unlawful business activity when they actively advertised for a fee illegal Internet gambling and that the Court will enjoin such activity," said Ira Rothken, an attorney for plaintiffs.
Plaintiffs allege that the defendants made enormous revenues actively supporting Internet gambling. For example, it was alleged that defendant Yahoo! (through its Overture subsidiary) recently made as much as $12.97 (or more) per "click-through" for directing its users to illegal Internet gambling websites. "The Court's ruling now clears the way for plaintiffs to investigate defendants' net gambling activities in the discovery process and learn the magnitude of their alleged wrongdoing," said Stan Mallison, an attorney for the plaintiffs. Plaintiffs are requesting in the complaint injunctive relief, a declaration from the court that such behavior is illegal, and the restoration to the general public of defendants' ill-gotten gains.
CONTACT INFORMATION: If you are California resident who has been adversely impacted by the search engine defendants' actions as alleged in this case or are otherwise interested in speaking to an attorney regarding this case, please contact any of the co-lead counsel below:
Reed Kathrein at Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins, LLP, via email at netgambling@lerachlaw.com.
Ira P. Rothken at the Rothken Law Firm via email to feedback@techfirm.com -- a copy of the complaint can be found at www.techfirm.com.
Stan S. Mallison at the Law Offices of Stan S. Mallison via email to Stanm@mallisonlaw.com.
SOURCE: Rothken Law Firm
Rothken Law Firm
Ira Rothken, 415-924-4250
Copyright Business Wire 2005
|
|

06-04-2005, 06:46 PM
|
|
Members
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 194
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Did anyone here have gambling related keywords on yahoo or google last summer? Sounds like they are going after the profits generated from the advertising from the individuals who paid for the advertising.
There were a couple of affiliate sites listed as examples in the superior court 60 page filing document.
__________________
Words to remember: You catch more flies with honey than with vinegar.
|

06-04-2005, 07:14 PM
|
|
|
I'm sure several people here had Adword campaigns going when Google allowed it. They may go after a few people but for one law office to try to apprehend every gambling affiliate who had an adwords or overture campaign going would be absurd.
Besides any of us are such small potatoes compared to the big search engines.
|

06-04-2005, 10:22 PM
|
|
Members
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: South Fla
Posts: 41
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
It really pisses me off when the big guys have to go after everybody..
Like how much is enough..
I was into the pharm business and adwords and overture stopped pharm PPC as well..
America where you are innocent until you run out of $$..
__________________
GOOD LUCK TO US ALL!!
JOHN
|

06-05-2005, 12:18 AM
|
|
|
The really crazy thing is that one of the people filing the lawsuit lost $100k playing at online casinos. Now this person is claiming to be a victim. When, according to the logic behind the class action suit, that person is actually a lawbreaker as well.
|

06-05-2005, 09:55 PM
|
|
Members
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 429
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
This is going to be a nail in the affiliates coffin.
|

06-06-2005, 03:45 AM
|
|
|
I agree that this is definitely something to watch closely and be concerned about.
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|