SEO Score

Ozpoker · #1 () 05-24-2007, 01:28 AM

I'm prolly last one to have found this but this is a very cool tool

http://whois.domaintools.com/

FWIW I scored 87% and meta relevance 56%

I guess that means I got work to do.

What is everyone else getting ?

Some kind of benchmark would to be handy

Cheers

AceHigh Pino · #2 () 05-24-2007, 02:35 AM

Website Title:	Poker Forums — Poker Ownage Blog
Record Type:	Domain Name
Meta Description:	Poker Forums
Meta Keywords:	poker, forums
AboutUs:	Wiki article on Pokerownage.com
SEO Score:	99%
Meta Relevance:	100%

NewPokerGirl · #3 () 05-24-2007, 02:40 AM

wow that tool is nice...its like 5 tools in one...good find

Website Title:	Small Stakes Texas Holdem \| Texas Holdem Strategy \| Poker Deposit Bonuses
Record Type:	Domain Name
AboutUs:	Wiki article on Smallstakestexasholdem.com
SEO Score:	77%
Meta Relevance:	90%

kaus · #4 () 05-24-2007, 06:53 AM

Website Title:	Poker Bonus \| Poker Rooms \| Learn To Play Texas Holdem
Record Type:	Domain Name
:

AboutUs:	Wiki article on Pokerriveronline.com
SEO Score:	93%
Meta Relevance:	78%

I thought I would have been lower in the SEO

mftpg · #5 () 05-24-2007, 07:08 AM

Also 77%... looks like I have work to do!

Thanks for the link Oz!

Cheers, Mark
http://www.sitandgoplanet.com
http://plan3tgongpoker.blogspot.com

jagan · #6 () 05-24-2007, 07:58 AM

Hello,

Here is nice collection of SEO Tools

http://www.seocompany.ca/tool/seo-tools.html

kaus · #7 () 05-27-2007, 09:49 AM

I would love to hear from some of the "experts" in this field as to how accurate they think this tool is.

Using the browser on here it pointed out faulty items that I fixed and bumped my seo score up to 98%.....could this be accurate?

fatbill · #8 () 05-27-2007, 10:46 AM

Website Title:	Texas Holdem Poker Blog
Record Type:	Domain Name

SEO Score:	91%
Meta Relevance:	92%

Ridge · #9 () 05-27-2007, 03:43 PM

Website Title:	Poker Tips, Freerolls, and Strategy Guide
Record Type:	Domain Name
AboutUs:	Wiki article on
SEO Score:	93%
Meta Relevance:	86%
Terms:	453 (Unique: 225, Linked: 65)
Images:	45 (Alt tags missing: 19)
Links:	40 (Internal: 23, Outbound: 17)

I'm curious too about how accurate this is..

JBlixt · #10 () 05-28-2007, 12:27 PM

Nice to see the stats. The new page were doing ok.

But i wounder about the wiki article.

I checked 3 pages but only one of them had the wiki-page. Why and is it worth to put some effort into writing and updating this article?

Am i correct when I asuming that the more information and descreption you have in your meta the less relevance you will get? We got a 100%, but the SEO was less ;(